Knox CVE Database
/
CVE-2026-25089
Critical
9.8

CVE-2026-25089: Fortinet FortiSandbox OS Command Injection Vulnerability

Fortinet FortiSandbox, FortiSandbox Cloud, and FortiSandbox PaaS contain an OS command injection vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests.

Added to the CISA KEV catalog:
July 16, 2026

Overview

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests

Vulnerability details

Affected vendor
Fortinet
Affected product
FortiSandbox
Weakness type (CWE)
CWE-78

FortiSandbox contains a CWE-78 OS command injection flaw in its HTTP request handling. The application incorporates attacker-supplied input from HTTP requests directly into OS-level command strings without properly neutralizing shell metacharacters, command separators, or injected command strings. Because the injection point is reachable before any authentication check, no credentials or session token are required. This weakness class is particularly severe in network security appliances, where the underlying OS typically has broad access to network interfaces, file systems, and administrative functions.

An attacker with network access to the FortiSandbox management or API HTTP interface sends specially crafted HTTP requests containing OS command injection payloads. The application passes the unsanitized input to the OS command interpreter, executing the attacker-supplied commands on the appliance or cloud instance. The sole precondition is that the HTTP interface be reachable from the attacker's position. Successful exploitation yields full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact: arbitrary command execution on the FortiSandbox host with no prior authentication.

Severity and impact

9.8
Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

Exploitation status

This vulnerability is confirmed as actively exploited in the wild — it is listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.

Known ransomware campaign use
Unknown

Detection and monitoring

  • Review FortiSandbox HTTP access logs for requests containing shell metacharacters (semicolons, pipe characters, backticks, dollar signs followed by parentheses) in parameter values or path segments, which have no legitimate use in normal API or management traffic.
  • Audit OS-level process creation logs on the FortiSandbox host for child processes spawned by the web service or API daemon that fall outside the expected process tree, such as shells (sh, bash) or system utilities invoked directly from the HTTP handler process.

Remediation

Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.
Federal (FCEB) remediation due date
July 19, 2026

Additional hardening

  • Restrict network access to the FortiSandbox management and API HTTP interface to explicitly defined administrative source IP ranges using perimeter firewall rules or FortiSandbox's own trusted-host configuration.
  • Place FortiSandbox on an isolated management VLAN with no direct inbound access from user networks, internet-facing segments, or cloud ingress paths.
  • If the management interface cannot be patched or isolated immediately, disable remote HTTP management access and require out-of-band or console-only administration until the patch is applied.
  • Audit FortiSandbox for unexpected files, scheduled tasks, or new user accounts as forensic triage indicators of prior exploitation, consistent with CISA's forensics triage requirements.

Key dates

Published (NVD)
June 9, 2026
Added to CISA KEV
July 16, 2026
Remediation deadline
July 19, 2026
Last updated
July 23, 2026

References

Frequently asked questions

Does CVE-2026-25089 affect my FedRAMP authorization?

If Fortinet FortiSandbox runs inside your authorization boundary, yes. CVE-2026-25089 is on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, which carries a remediation deadline of July 19, 2026. For a FedRAMP-authorized service, an unpatched KEV in your boundary is a finding — one you either remediate or formally document a mitigation for before your assessor and sponsoring agency raise it.

How does Knox help me handle CVE-2026-25089?

Knox doesn't patch your software for you — remediating Fortinet FortiSandbox is your responsibility under the FedRAMP shared responsibility model. What Knox gives you is the pre-authorized, single-tenant boundary to remediate in, plus continuous compliance monitoring and audit-artifact coverage that help you document the fix for your next assessment. The fix is yours to apply; staying compliant while you apply it isn't something you manage alone.

How does Knox's monitoring help with vulnerabilities like this?

Knox's continuous monitoring, powered by KnoxAI, watches your environment in real time for newly disclosed vulnerabilities and compliance issues. Exposure surfaces as part of ongoing monitoring — not only when an assessor flags it at review time.

How do I get FedRAMP authorized with Knox?

Book a meeting and Knox maps your path — FedRAMP in 90 days for 90% less, without dependency or delay.

What happens if CVE-2026-25089 isn't remediated by July 19, 2026?

It becomes a POA&M item, and a growing POA&M list is what turns a routine continuous-monitoring review into a real conversation with your agency. Meeting the deadline keeps your authorization clean and the agency relationship intact.

What this vulnerability means for your FedRAMP compliance

Because this flaw is in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, FedRAMP continuous monitoring puts a hard remediation clock on it. The clock starts on awareness — and missing the deadline can put an Authority to Operate at risk.

FedRAMP remediation deadlines for actively exploited vulnerabilities

FedRAMP ConMon SLAs give cloud providers 30, 90, or 180 days by severity — but KEV-listed flaws carry the tighter CISA deadline shown above. For authorized services, that date is the compliance line that assessors and agency sponsors will check.

How Knox reduces the burden of CVE vulnerabilities

Remediating the flaw is your responsibility under the FedRAMP shared responsibility model — but staying compliant while you fix it isn't something you manage alone. KnoxAI's continuous monitoring surfaces exposure in real time, and Knox keeps your continuous-monitoring evidence and audit artifacts current while you apply the fix. Learn more about the Knox platform.

How to limit your exposure through inherited controls and isolation

Knox's single-tenant architecture gives every customer a dedicated boundary, and 60–80% of FedRAMP controls are inherited from the platform — shrinking the surface you have to patch and prove. See why teams choose Knox.

Ready to achieve FedRAMP authorization in 90 days or less?

Schedule a meeting to discuss scope, parse readiness, and map your company’s accelerated path to FedRAMP authorization.

Book a Meeting