Federal cloud authorization, from civilian to defense
Selling software to the U.S. government means navigating two major frameworks: FedRAMP for civilian agencies, and the DoD Cloud Computing SRG for defense. Here's how they relate, when you need each, and how to operate across both.




















Before FedRAMP or DISA Impact Levels, there is FIPS 199 — the standard that classifies every federal system by the impact of a security breach.
FIPS 199 rates systems across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, then categorizes each as Low, Moderate, or High. Those categories determine the required security controls. FedRAMP applies FIPS 199 to cloud systems. The DoD Cloud Computing SRG builds on FedRAMP, and Impact Levels extend those requirements for defense use.
Confidentiality · Integrity · Availability Low · Moderate · High
Two frameworks, one lineage
FedRAMP standardizes cloud security for civilian agencies. The DoD Cloud Computing SRG takes that same baseline and adds defense-specific requirements on top.
The standard for civilian federal agencies
FedRAMP produces a standardized, reusable authorization package assessed against NIST SP 800-53. Each agency reviews that package and issues its own ATO based on mission and risk tolerance.
The framework for defense cloud security
Governed by DISA, the DoD Cloud Computing SRG applies Impact Levels (IL2, IL4, IL5, IL6) on top of FedRAMP baselines to address DoD-specific data sensitivity and mission requirements.
How the DoD measures data sensitivity
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) is sensitive government data that is not classified, but still requires protection — export-controlled data, critical infrastructure information, health information, law enforcement data, and mission-related operational data. Impact Levels define how sensitive DoD data is and what protection it requires.
- Low-sensitivity, public or non-critical data
- Roughly aligned with FedRAMP Moderate
- Not typically relevant for most SaaS companies
- Primary level for CUI workloads
- Based on FedRAMP Moderate or High, plus DoD FedRAMP+ controls and CNSSI 1253 overlays, depending on data categorization
- Supports confidentiality / integrity levels up to MMx or HHx
- Requires a DISA Provisional Authorization (PA)
- Unclassified National Security Systems and National Security Information (NSS / NSI)
- Based on FedRAMP High, plus DoD FedRAMP+ controls, CNSSI 1253 overlays, and NSS controls
- Elevated-protection CUI may also be hosted here when required
- Requires stronger isolation and access controls than IL4
Impact Levels extend FedRAMP. They don't replace it.
The frameworks stack. FedRAMP is the baseline. Impact Levels are a DoD construct applied on top of that baseline to address defense data sensitivity and mission requirements — each level inherits everything below it and adds more.
FedRAMP vs. IL4 vs. IL5
The same security lineage, escalating by data sensitivity and mission requirements.
| FedRAMP | IL4 | IL5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Governing body | GSA / FedRAMP PMO | DISA | DISA |
| Primary use | Civilian agencies | DoD CUI workloads | DoD NSS / NSI workloads |
| Security baseline | NIST SP 800-53 | FedRAMP Moderate or High + DoD overlays | FedRAMP High + DoD overlays |
| Data type | Low, Moderate, High | CUI | NSS / NSI (with some elevated CUI) |
| Authorization | Agency ATO | DISA Provisional Authorization | DISA Provisional Authorization |
| Typical entry point | Moderate | IL4 | IL5 |
See where your product lands across both frameworks.
FedRAMP, IL4, or IL5?
Most companies move through all three over time — FedRAMP for baseline authorization and civilian adoption, IL4 for initial DoD entry, IL5 for deeper defense and national security work.
- You're selling to civilian agencies
- You want broad federal market access
- You're selling to the Department of Defense
- Your product handles CUI
- You're entering DoD environments
- You're supporting national security workloads
- Your system is classified as NSS / NSI
- Higher isolation and assurance are required
Not sure which level applies to you? Talk it through with an authorization advisor.
Every framework runs through the same gate
Regardless of framework, to work with the government a company still needs the same three things.
- An ATO (Authority to Operate)
- A sponsoring or authorizing authority
- A fully compliant environment
Not because companies don't understand the frameworks — but because they must navigate multiple systems and obtain authorization within each.
Authorization in 90 days
Knox gives you a single path across FedRAMP and DoD Impact Levels — for roughly 90% less than the DIY route.














Inherit 16+ ATOs and reach authorization in 90 days.
FedRAMP & Impact Levels, clarified
The questions vendors ask most when planning across civilian and defense.
Knox provides a single path across all three.
FedRAMP. IL4. IL5. Handled.
Start selling to the federal government in 90 days. Schedule a briefing to map your path across civilian and defense authorization.